Positive Attention, Praise, and Rewards
Recommendation 3 focuses on increasing expected behavior by intentionally noticing and acknowledging it. This lesson examines how school psychologists can help teachers move beyond vague praise toward specific, meaningful, equitable, and sustainable systems of acknowledgment.
Teacher-Delivered Behavioral Interventions in Grades K–5
Read Recommendation 3: Pages 28–38Pay particular attention to the distinctions among positive attention, praise, and rewards; behavior-specific praise; student preferences; equitable acknowledgment; and adjusting the frequency of reinforcement over time.
Notice the Behaviors You Want to See More Often
Positive acknowledgment is more than being nice to students. When teacher attention, praise, or rewards reliably follow an expected behavior, those consequences can strengthen the likelihood that the behavior will occur again.
The guide distinguishes among three related strategies. Each can be useful, but they are not interchangeable.
Building an Effective Acknowledgment System
Focus attention on observable behaviors that are connected to classroom expectations and meaningful student success.
Attention, praise, and rewards do not function identically for every student. Student and caregiver input can help identify preferences and culturally relevant forms of acknowledgment.
Tell the student what they did successfully rather than relying only on broad statements such as “good job.”
Make the connection between the expected behavior and the earned outcome clear enough that the student understands what led to the reward.
Teachers may naturally notice problem behavior more readily than successful behavior. Deliberate scanning increases opportunities to acknowledge students who are meeting expectations.
Higher rates of acknowledgment may be useful while a behavior is being established. As the behavior becomes more consistent, reinforcement can become less frequent while still maintaining success.
“We Already Praise Them” Does Not Tell You Enough
In consultation, broad descriptions such as “I praise him all the time” or “rewards don't work” provide very little information about the actual intervention. The psychologist can help determine whether acknowledgment is specific, contingent, frequent enough, meaningful, and distributed equitably.
Which Praise Is More Useful?
Choose the statement that most clearly identifies the successful student behavior.
Build an Acknowledgment Plan
Select the strongest components for a student whose independent work behavior is just beginning to improve.
What behavior should be acknowledged?
What type of praise best fits?
What reward is most defensible?
What should happen as success becomes consistent?
“Praise Doesn't Work”
Work through a consultation in which a teacher believes positive reinforcement has already failed.
What should you ask first?
What is the strongest next step?
What is the best next consultation decision?
What Does the Attention Data Suggest?
Apply the concepts from this lesson to interpret classroom attention and praise data. Your response will receive individualized AI feedback.
Key Takeaways for School Psychologists
- Positive attention, behavior-specific praise, and rewards are related but distinct forms of acknowledgment.
- Behavior-specific praise clearly identifies the behavior that the student demonstrated successfully.
- Rewards should be meaningful to the individual student rather than assumed to be reinforcing.
- Teachers may need to deliberately scan for expected behavior because problem behavior can attract attention more readily.
- School psychologists can help examine whether positive acknowledgment is specific, contingent, timely, equitable, and actually valued by students.
- Higher rates of reinforcement may be appropriate while behavior is being established, followed by gradual thinning as students become more successful and independent.